Dinesh on Java

public class Drawing{
   private Shape shape;
   public Drawing(Shape shape) {
      this.shape = shape;
   }
}

Here Drawing does not care about the what type shape should be to draw. The Shape will be implemented independently and will be provided to Drawing at the time of Drawing instantiation and this entire procedure is controlled by the Spring Framework.

Here, we have removed the total control from Drawing and kept it somewhere else (ie. XML configuration file) and the dependency ( ie. class Shape) is being injected into the class Shape through a Class Constructor. Thus flow of control has been “inverted” by Dependency Injection (DI) because you have effectively delegated dependance’s to some external system.

Dependency with Setter Injection–

public class Drawing{
   private Shape shape;
   public void setShape(Shape shape) {
      this.shape = shape;
   }
}

Second method of injecting dependency is through Setter Methods of Drawing class where we will create Shape instance and this instance will be used to call setter methods to initialize Drawing’s properties.

Real Life Based Introduction to Dependency Injection

Scenario 1 You work in an organization where you and your colleagues tend to travel a lot. Generally you travel by air and every time you need to catch a flight, you arrange for a pickup by a cab. You are aware of the airline agency who does the flight bookings, and the cab agency which arranges for the cab to drop you off at the airport. You know the phone numbers of the agencies, you are aware of the typical conversational activities to conduct the necessary bookings.
Thus your typical travel planning routine might look like the following :

• Decide the destination, and desired arrival date and time
• Call up the airline agency and convey the necessary information to obtain a flight booking.
• Call up the cab agency, request for a cab to be able to catch a particular flight from say your residence (the cab agency in turn might need to communicate with the airline agency to obtain the flight departure schedule, the airport, compute the distance between your residence and the airport and compute the appropriate time at which to have the cab reach your residence)
• Pickup the tickets, catch the cab and be on your way

Now if your company suddenly changed the preferred agencies and their contact mechanisms, you would be subject to the following relearning scenarios

• The new agencies, and their new contact mechanisms (say the new agencies offer internet based services and the way to do the bookings is over the internet instead of over the phone)
• The typical conversational sequence through which the necessary bookings get done (Data instead of voice).

Its not just you, but probably many of your colleagues would need to adjust themselves to the new scenario. This could lead to a substantial amount of time getting spent in the readjustment process.
Scenario 2 Now lets say the protocol is a little bit different. You have an administration department. Whenever you needed to travel an administration department interactive telephony system simply calls you up (which in turn is hooked up to the agencies). Over the phone you simply state the destination, desired arrival date and time by responding to a programmed set of questions. The flight reservations are made for you, the cab gets scheduled for the appropriate time, and the tickets get delivered to you.
Now if the preferred agencies were changed, the administration department would become aware of a change, would perhaps readjust its workflow to be able to communicate with the agencies. The interactive telephony system could be reprogrammed to communicate with the agencies over the internet. However you and your colleagues would have no relearning required. You still continue to follow exactly the same protocol as earlier (since the administration department did all the necessary adaptation in a manner that you do not need to do anything differently).
Dependency Injection ? In both the scenarios, you are the client and you are dependent upon the services provided by the agencies. However Scenario 2 has a few differences.

• You don’t need to know the contact numbers / contact points of the agencies – the administration department calls you when necessary.
• You don’t need to know the exact conversational sequence by which they conduct their activities (Voice / Data etc.) (though you are aware of a particular standardized conversational sequence with the administration department)
• The services you are dependent upon are provided to you in a manner that you do not need to readjust should the service providers change.

Thats dependency injection in “real life”. This may not seem like a lot since you imagine a cost to yourself as a single person – but if you imagine a large organization the savings are likely to be substantial.